Anna Hazare fighting corruption through his Anti Corruption
movement while Julian Assange fighting through Wikileaks.
Recently Wikileaks revealed that UP chief minister Mayawati
had send private jet to get her favorite pair of shoes from Mumbai airport. On
the other hand in post Anti corruption movement fever government forcefully providing
Anna Hazare ’Z’ level security against
his will to cut down his common man reach.
Both are fighting against the harmful elements of society
and corruption in community in their own way.
Most of the individuals reviled
by Wikileaks are exploiting people’s money for their own good. Their agenda in
politics always was for own greed and to make money while ideally it has to be
for peoples service. The always forgot that there are the servants of people
not their owners.
Julian Assange breaks through government secured networks
from back doors and reveals confidential information of an individual or a
nation to show its true face so that people can be aware of back stage games.
While Anna Hazare enter from front door straight ahead, face to face and take
head on with system.
Both are doings right things on their own level in their own
style.
But here is the difference, Assange who has good communication
skills, strong network, knowledge about system fails to create a mass support
and a revolution against the corrupt government and individuals while Anna Hazare
who barely speaks English and broken Hindi gathered a huge support not only in India
but all over the world.
Creativity, structure maintains, commitment, discipline and
knowledge are the qualities required by Excellent Manager where Julian Assange
scores most while Integrity, dedication, creativity, fairness, assertiveness, magnanimity
are the qualities required by a Great leader where Anna Hazare top the chart.
Government keeping Assange in custody while Government respectfully
accepting Anna’s suggestion for structural reforms.
Assange through Wikileaks only reveling the black secretes
caused by corruption while Anna Hazare through his fight against corruption not
only taking head on with the government and reveling the hidden truth but also challenging
the whole system and suggesting root measures like Jan Lokapl Bill and Right to
Recall, Right to Reject and fighting for it get noticed.
i find the article a bit biased :)
ReplyDeletejulian has his own way and wikileaks is much appreicated around the globe and it does have immense impact on masses....agree that perhaps the masses are educated or niche, but most of the world is english speaking and well aware of juliane...
i wish it was a bit more researched...first time on your blog...look fwd for more!
@ Chintan....
ReplyDeleteBiased as in ?...
Ofcose Julian is well known but failed to create impact on system ...while Hazare become successful in dat area..
what makes you think Anna is successful? just getting a bill passed won't make india corruption free and juliane can make any politician pee in the pants....
ReplyDeletebiased for anna...
Dear Chintan ....i love Julian too...
ReplyDeleteBut still ...big difference...passing the bill will make difference...but making politicians pee in pants wont change the system..!!!
I think Julian and Anna both have a different way of working and different personalities, it is not a good idea to compare between them. Some what like Gandhi n Bhagat......Two different people fighting for the same cause...but I like your concept :)
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing
@ Bhavna
ReplyDeleteWhen two people are fighting for the same cause ..you need to compare them for better understanding and extracting lessons out of it..to examine their effectiveness,..
for me the nature of fighting is not really important.....its the cause whats important is are they putting all what they have for the cause? are they doing the best they can? the results can change...what matters is , yes he put it all he did the best he can for the cause
ReplyDeletewell nature of fighting decides the date and nature of result...
ReplyDelete